Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorLlano Astuy, Tamara 
dc.contributor.authorDosal Viñas, Elena 
dc.contributor.authorLindorfer, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorFinger, David C.
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-30T14:08:22Z
dc.date.available2021-11-30T14:08:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-05
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/23267
dc.description.abstractThe European Union is planning a new program to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. In this context, the Icelandic government plans to ban new registrations of fossil fuel cars after 2030 as one of the strategies to make Iceland a carbon-neutral country by 2040. Upgraded biogas can be directly used in vehicles with CNG engines, reducing CO2 emissions by 80%. In this paper, several alternatives of biogas plants, simulated in previous research, were evaluated by considering techno-economic and environmental criteria through the application of multi-criteria decision-making tools. Twelve alternatives were analyzed using the Definite 3.1 software. A weighted summation algorithm, which transforms all criteria into the same scale by multiplying them by weights and then summing them to obtain the results, was used in the analysis. The multi-criteria analysis of the twelve proposed alternatives included eleven criteria (three technical, five economic, and three environmental) whose weights were changed in a total of eleven scenarios. From a global perspective, when all criteria were considered (9.1% weight) the best alternative with a score of 0.58 was the single-stage biogas plant working with municipal solid waste. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses also demonstrated that the multi-criteria results obtained were robust and reliable.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe APC was paid by the COST Action CA17133 Circular City (“Implementing naturebased solutions for creating a resourceful circular city”, http://www.circular-city.eu, duration 22 October 2018–21 October 2022).es_ES
dc.format.extent17 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rights© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceWater, 2021, 13(16), 2150es_ES
dc.subject.otherBiogases_ES
dc.subject.otherBiomethanees_ES
dc.subject.otherMulti-criteria analysises_ES
dc.subject.otherMunicipal solid wastees_ES
dc.subject.otherFood wastees_ES
dc.subject.otherLignocellulosic biomasses_ES
dc.subject.otherWeighted summationes_ES
dc.titleApplication of multi-criteria decision-making tools for assessing biogas plants: a case study in Reykjavik, Icelandes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.3390/w13162150
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.