Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorLlano Astuy, Tamara 
dc.contributor.authorRueda Ruiz, Cristina 
dc.contributor.authorDosal Viñas, Elena 
dc.contributor.authorAndrés Payán, Ana 
dc.contributor.authorCoz Fernández, Alberto 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-17T08:04:43Z
dc.date.available2021-11-17T08:04:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-11
dc.identifier.issn0961-9534
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/23028
dc.description.abstractThe transformation of fermentable sugars provided from lignocellulosic wastes into biofuels or bioproducts is a key point at second-generation biorefineries. Spent sulfite liquor is a xylose-rich hydrolysate constituting the main residue of sulfite mills producing dissolving cellulose. Due to the presence of the inhibitors in the spent liquor, the most promising valorization options require detoxification before sugars bioconversion. In this work, a multi criteria analysis was implemented to select techno-economic and socio-environmental feasible detoxification alternatives that can be adapted to a wide variety of fermenting scenarios. Total inhibitors removal, phenolics removal, acetic acid removal, lignosulfonates removal, total sugar losses, fixed capital invested, manufacturing costs, waste toxicity, social acceptance, and employment were chosen as the most relevant criteria. The maximum allowable concentration of undesirable inhibitors cannot be established with a general character, and thereby decision-making tools result in feasible and efficient solutions. From a technical viewpoint best solution was anionic resins with a score of 0.68; the most economical alternative was the overliming with a score of 0.76; finally, from a socio-environmental perspective, overliming reached the highest score of 0.78. In addition, three spent liquor biorefinery models were proposed. Based on the multicriteria analysis and based on the inhibitor?s concentration affecting fermentation yields and productivity, the best detoxification alternatives were (1) anionic resins for polyhydroxyalkanoate production; (2) activated carbon for ethanol biorefinery; (3) overliming for xylitol biorefinery.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by KBBE-2012-6-311935 BRIGIT research project www.brigit-project.eues_ES
dc.format.extent11 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceBiomass and Bioenergy, 2021, 154, 106274es_ES
dc.subject.otherDetoxificationes_ES
dc.subject.otherEthanoles_ES
dc.subject.otherPolyhydroxyalkanoateses_ES
dc.subject.otherSpent liquores_ES
dc.subject.otherXylitoles_ES
dc.titleMulti-criteria analysis of detoxification alternatives: techno-economic and socio-environmental assessmentes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106274es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/311935/EU/New tailor-made biopolymers produced from ignocellulosic sugars waste for highly demanding fire-resistant/BRIGIT/es_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106274
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International