Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorBaño Medina, Jorge 
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Manzanas, Rodrigo 
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Llorente, José Manuel
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-15T16:52:52Z
dc.date.available2021-11-15T16:52:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.identifier.issn0930-7575
dc.identifier.issn1432-0894
dc.identifier.otherPID2019-111481RB-I00es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/23024
dc.description.abstractIn a recent paper, Baño-Medina et al. (Confguration and Intercomparison of deep learning neural models for statistical downscaling. preprint, 2019) assessed the suitability of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for downscaling of temperature and precipitation over Europe using large-scale 'perfect' reanalysis predictors. They compared the results provided by CNNs with those obtained from a set of standard methods which have been traditionally used for downscaling purposes (linear and generalized linear models), concluding that CNNs are well suited for continental-wide applications. That analysis is extended here by assessing the suitability of CNNs for downscaling future climate change projections using Global Climate Model (GCM) outputs as predictors. This is particularly relevant for this type of 'black-box' models, whose results cannot be easily explained based on physical reasons and could potentially lead to implausible downscaled projections due to uncontrolled extrapolation artifacts. Based on this premise, we analyze in this work the two key assumptions that are made in perfect prognosis downscaling: (1) the predictors chosen to build the statistical model should be well reproduced by GCMs and (2) the statistical model should be able to reliably extrapolate out of sample (climate change) conditions. As a first step to test the suitability of these models, the latter assumption is assessed here by analyzing how the CNNs afect the raw GCM climate change signal (defned as the diference, or delta, between future and historical climate). Our results show that, as compared to well-established generalized linear models (GLMs), CNNs yield smaller departures from the raw GCM outputs for the end of century, resulting in more plausible downscaling results for climate change applications. Moreover, as a consequence of the automatic treatment of spatial features, CNNs are also found to provide more spatially homogeneous downscaled patterns than GLMs.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors acknowledge partial support from the ATLAS project, funded by the Spanish Research Program (PID2019-111481RB-I00). Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.es_ES
dc.format.extent11 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceClimate Dynamics, 2021, 57(11-12), 2941-2951es_ES
dc.subject.otherStatistical downscalinges_ES
dc.subject.otherRegional climate change scenarioses_ES
dc.subject.otherDeep learninges_ES
dc.subject.otherConvolutional neural networks (CNNs)es_ES
dc.subject.otherGeneralized linear models (GLMs)es_ES
dc.titleOn the suitability of deep convolutional neural networks for continental-wide downscaling of climate change projectionses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05847-0es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1007/s00382-021-05847-0
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International