Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorGómez Revuelta, Marcos
dc.contributor.authorPelayo Terán, José María
dc.contributor.authorJuncal Ruiz, María
dc.contributor.authorVázquez Bourgon, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorSuárez Pinilla, Paula 
dc.contributor.authorRomero Jiménez, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorSetién Suero, María Esther
dc.contributor.authorAyesa Arriola, Rosa 
dc.contributor.authorCrespo Facorro, Benedicto 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-02T11:52:23Z
dc.date.available2021-06-02T11:52:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-24
dc.identifier.issn1461-1457
dc.identifier.issn1469-5111
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/21819
dc.description.abstractBackground: Different effectiveness profiles among antipsychotics may be a key point to optimize treatment in patients suffering a first episode of psychosis to impact on long-term outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and quetiapine in the treatment of first episode of psychosis at 3-year follow-up. Method: From February 2001 to January 2011, 2 phases of a prospective, randomized, open-label study were undertaken. A total of 376 first-episode drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to olanzapine (n=55), risperidone (n=63), haloperidol (n=56), aripiprazole (n=78), ziprasidone (n=62), or quetiapine (n=62) and followed up for 3 years. The primary effectiveness measure was all cause of treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted in the analysis for clinical efficacy. Results: The overall dropout rate at 3 years reached 20.75%. Treatment discontinuation rates were significantly different among treatment groups (olanzapine=69.09, risperidone=71.43, aripiprazole=73.08%, ziprasidone=79.03%, haloperidol=89.28%, and quetiapine=95.53%) (x2=79.86; P=.000). Statistically significant differences in terms of lack of efficacy, adherence, and tolerability were observed among treatment groups along the 3-year follow-up, determining significant differences in time to all-cause discontinuation (log-rank=92.240; P=.000). Significant differences between treatments were found in the categories of sleepiness/sedation, increased sleep duration, akinesia, weight gain, ejaculatory dysfunction, extrapyramidal-symptoms, and amenorrhea. Conclusions: Olanzapine, risperidone, and aripiprazole presented advantages for the first-line treatment of first episode of psychosis in terms of effectiveness. Identifying different discontinuation patterns may contribute to optimize treatment selection after first episode of psychosis.es_ES
dc.format.extent13 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2020) 23(4): 217-229es_ES
dc.subject.otherSchizophreniaes_ES
dc.subject.otherAntipsychoticses_ES
dc.subject.otherFirst-episode-psychosises_ES
dc.titleAntipsychotic Treatment Effectiveness in First Episode of Psychosis: PAFIP 3-Year Follow-Up Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Haloperidol, Olanzapine, Risperidone, Aripiprazole, Quetiapine, and Ziprasidonees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://academic.oup.com/ijnp/article/23/4/217/5715030es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1093/ijnp/pyaa004
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International