Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorCorredor Ortega, Juan
dc.contributor.authorHarankahage, Dulanjan
dc.contributor.authorGloaguen, Frederic
dc.contributor.authorRivero Martínez, María José 
dc.contributor.authorZamkov, Mikhail
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Uribe, Inmaculada 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-10T06:33:26Z
dc.date.available2023-09-30T00:36:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.issn1879-1298
dc.identifier.otherRTI2018-099407-B-I00es_ES
dc.identifier.otherRTI2018-093310-B-I00es_ES
dc.identifier.otherRTC2019-006820-5es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/21566
dc.description.abstractPhotocatalytic systems comprising a hydrogenase-type catalyst and CdX (X = S, Se, Te) chalcogenide quantum dot (QD) photosensitizers show extraordinary hydrogen production rates under visible light excitation. What remains unknown is the mechanism of energy conversion in these systems. Here, we have explored this question by comparing the performance of two QD sensitizers, CdSe and CdTe, in photocatalytic systems featuring aqueous suspensions of a [Fe2 (μ-1,2-benzenedithiolate) CO6] catalyst and an ascorbic acid sacrificial agent. Overall, the hydrogen production yield for CdSe-sensitized reactions QDs was found to be 13 times greater than that of CdTe counterparts. According to emission quenching experiments, an enhanced performance of CdSe sensitizers reflected a greater rate of electron transfer from the ascorbic acid (kAsc). The observed difference in the QD-ascorbic acid charge transfer rates between the two QD materials was consistent with respective driving forces for these systems.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial support from projects RTI2018-099407-B-I00, RTI2018-093310-B-I00, RTC2019-006820-5 (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) and ‘HYLANTIC’-EAPA_204/2016 (Interreg Atlantic/FEDER UE) is gratefully acknowledged. Juan Corredor is grateful to FPI contract grant (BES-2016-079201). MZ and DH were supported by the Award DE-SC0016872 (MZ) funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science.es_ES
dc.format.extent38 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rights© 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceChemosphere, 2021, 278, 130485es_ES
dc.subject.otherPhotocatalytic hydrogen productiones_ES
dc.subject.otherHydrogenase mimices_ES
dc.subject.otherQuantum dotes_ES
dc.subject.otherCdSees_ES
dc.subject.otherCdTees_ES
dc.subject.otherElectron transferes_ES
dc.subject.otherHybrid systemses_ES
dc.titleInfluence of QD photosensitizers in the photocatalytic production of hydrogen with biomimetic [FeFe]-hydrogenase. Comparative performance of CdSe and CdTees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130485es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130485
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license