Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorAbejón Elías, Ricardo 
dc.contributor.authorLaso Cortabitarte, Jara 
dc.contributor.authorMargallo Blanco, María 
dc.contributor.authorAldaco García, Rubén 
dc.contributor.authorBlanca Alcubilla, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorBala Gala, Alba
dc.contributor.authorFullana i Palmer, Pere
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T11:08:39Z
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:17:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-15
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.issn1879-1026
dc.identifier.otherCTM2016-76176-C2-1-Res_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/20910
dc.description.abstractFood and beverage packaging represent a relevant fraction of municipal solid waste, and its adequate management is critical. Selective waste collection by an authorized organization according to an Extended Producer Responsibility System (EPRS) is the current option implemented in Spain for packaging. Other European countries have selected an alternative or a complement: a Deposit-Refund System (DRS) for certain type of beverage packaging. The selection of an EPRS or a DRS is a complex task and this work developed a universal methodology for the evaluation of optimal waste packaging management systems, focused on food and beverage. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach was applied to compare the current EPRS vs the implementation of a new system, with the coexistence of a DRS and a reduced EPRS. Although the environmental savings of the new system are superior to its impacts, even if the DRS would reach a value of 90% for the package return index, the current EPRS obtains significantly better environmental results. All impact categories are favorable to the current EPRS, except ADP, where the potentially higher DRS recycling rate is manifested. The impact associated to the flow of specific DRS packages in the new system is clearly higher than that linked to the flow of DRS excluded packages and it is even higher that the impact of the total joint flow in the current EPRS for all categories except ADP. The fundamental cause of this high impact is the backhauling stage to transport the recovered packages to the counting plants without compacting. A sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the preference of the current EPRS over the combination of a DRS and a reduced EPRS. The developed approach supposes a methodological advance that can be extended to previously realized studies about the implementation of waste management systems in other contexts.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors are grateful for the funding of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the Ceres-Procom Project CTM2016-76176 (AEI/FEDER, UE), which aims to determine strategies to improve the sustainability of current food and beverage productionand consumption, and which has guided the methodology within the Ariadna Project.es_ES
dc.format.extent41 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceScience of the Total Environment, 2020, 721, 137744es_ES
dc.subject.otherLife Cycle Assessment (LCA)es_ES
dc.subject.otherDeposit-Refundes_ES
dc.subject.otherExtended Producer Responsibilityes_ES
dc.subject.otherPackaging wastees_ES
dc.subject.otherBeverage packaginges_ES
dc.subject.otherSelective collectiones_ES
dc.titleEnvironmental impact assessment of the implementation of a Deposit-Refund System for packaging waste in Spain: A solution or an additional problem?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137744es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137744
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license