Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorAbejón Elías, Ricardo 
dc.contributor.authorBala Gala, Alba
dc.contributor.authorVázquez Rowe, Ian
dc.contributor.authorAldaco García, Rubén 
dc.contributor.authorFullana i Palmer, Pere
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T11:02:00Z
dc.date.available2022-04-30T00:46:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-04
dc.identifier.issn0921-3449
dc.identifier.issn1879-0658
dc.identifier.otherCTM2016-76176-C2-1-Res_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/20908
dc.description.abstractFood packaging is an important industrial sector that has great influence on food loss and waste. The search of optimal conditions to minimize the negative impacts of food packaging on the environment must promote the selection of the best available packages. This work has evaluated the environmental impact of the distribution of fruit and vegetables in the Spanish peninsular context using reusable plastic crates and single-use cardboard boxes. Discussion and decision at each phase and step of the methodology were provided, being an example to follow for similar studies in the future. For the analysis, five different impact categories were considered: global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone depletion potential and photochemical oxidant creation potential. In addition, energy and water consumption were taken into account. According to the results of the analysis, the use of reusable plastic crates should be selected, since the values of all impact categories and energy consumption indicators were higher in the case of single-use cardboard boxes. The sensitivity analysis revealed a robust preference for plastic crates in comparison with cardboard boxes even in alternative scenarios, and only the hypothetic reduction of the quality of the cardboard resulted in significant lower impacts for cardboard boxes in comparison to plastic crates in photochemical oxidant creation potential, acidification potential, and energy consumption. This work demonstrates that plastic packaging should not be totally excluded or banned, since it can be the most environmentally friendly option in certain applications.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe project has been mainly promoted by ARECO. The UNESCO Chair in Life Cycle and Climate Change ESCI-UPF has performed the LCA study, while the Universidad de Cantabria has led the critical review panel, in which also participated experts from AENOR and CIEMAT, to whom the authors are very grateful for their improvement contributions. The authors are also grateful for the funding of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the Project CTM2016-76176 (AEI/FEDER, UE). Ian Vázquez-Rowe wishes to thank the Dirección Académica de Relaciones Internacionales (DARI) from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) for financial support during his research stay at the Universidad de Cantabria in August-September 2019.es_ES
dc.format.extent53 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rights© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceResources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 155, 104666es_ES
dc.subject.otherLife cycle assessment (LCA)es_ES
dc.subject.otherFruit and vegetableses_ES
dc.subject.otherPackaginges_ES
dc.subject.otherDistributiones_ES
dc.subject.otherReusable plastic crateses_ES
dc.subject.otherSingle-use cardboard boxeses_ES
dc.titleWhen plastic packaging should be preferred: life cycle analysis of packages for fruit and vegetable distribution in the Spanish peninsular marketes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104666es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104666
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license