Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorRamírez García, David
dc.contributor.authorSantamaría Caballero, Luis Ignacio 
dc.contributor.authorPérez Arriaga, Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorVía Rodríguez, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Naya, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorFernández Caramés, Tiago Manuel
dc.contributor.authorPérez Iglesias, Héctor José
dc.contributor.authorGonzález López, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorCastedo Ribas, Luis
dc.contributor.authorTorres Royo, José Miguel
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-28T16:45:04Z
dc.date.available2020-10-28T16:45:04Z
dc.date.issued2008-11
dc.identifier.issn1530-8669
dc.identifier.issn1530-8677
dc.identifier.otherTEC2004-06451-C05-02es_ES
dc.identifier.otherTEC2004-06451-C05-01es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/19502
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we employ a 2×2 Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) hardware platform to evaluate, in realistic indoor scenarios, the performance of different space-time block coded (STBC) transmissions at 2.4GHz. In particular, we focus on the Alamouti orthogonal scheme considering two types of channel state information (CSI) estimation: a conventional pilot-aided supervised technique and a recently proposed blind method based on second-order statistics (SOS). For comparison purposes, we also evaluate the performance of a Differential (non-coherent) space-time block coding (DSTBC). DSTBC schemes have the advantage of not requiring CSI estimation but they incur in a 3dB loss in performance. The hardware MIMO platform is based on high-performance signal acquisition and generation boards, each one equipped with a 1GB memory module that allows the transmission of extremely large data frames. Upconversion to RF is performed by two RF vector signal generators whereas downconversion is carried out with two custom circuits designed from commercial components. All the baseband signal processing is implemented off-line in MATLAB®, making the MIMO testbed very flexible and easily reconfigurable. Using this platform we compare the performance of the described methods in line-of-sight (LOS) and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) indoor scenarios.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been supported by Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia of Spain, Xunta de Galicia and FEDER funds of the European Union under grant numbers TEC2004-06451-C05-02, TEC2004-06451-C05-01, PGIDT05PXIC10502PN, and FPU grants AP2004-5127 and AP2006-2965.es_ES
dc.format.extent16 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherHindawies_ES
dc.rights© Wiley & Sons bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceWireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2008, 8(9), 1149-1164es_ES
dc.subject.otherMultiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO)es_ES
dc.subject.otherSpace-time block codeses_ES
dc.subject.otherBlind Channel Estimationes_ES
dc.subject.otherPrincipal component analysis (PCA)es_ES
dc.subject.otherMIMO testbedses_ES
dc.titleA comparative study of STBC transmissions at 2.4 GHz over indoor channels using a 2 × 2 MIMO testbedes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1002/wcm.558
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© Wiley & Sons bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © Wiley & Sons bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0