Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorHidalgo-Tenorio, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorVinuesa, David
dc.contributor.authorPlata, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorMartin Dávila, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorIftimie, Simona
dc.contributor.authorSequera, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorLoeches, Belén
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Cortés, Luis Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorFariñas Álvarez, María del Carmen 
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Roldan, Concepción
dc.contributor.authorJavier-Martinez, Rosario
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorArenas-Miras, María del Mar
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Marcos, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorMiró, José María
dc.contributor.authorHerrero, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorBereciartua, Elena
dc.contributor.authorJesus, Samantha E. de
dc.contributor.authorPasquau, Juan
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-24T08:10:56Z
dc.date.available2020-07-24T08:10:56Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1476-0711
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/18948
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: Objectives: To analyse the effectiveness of dalbavancin (DBV) in clinical practice as consolidation therapy in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) and/or infective endocarditis (IE) produced by gram-positive cocci (GPC), as well as its safety and pharmacoeconomic impact. Methods: A multicentre, observational and retrospective study was conducted of hospitalised patients with IE and/ or BSI produced by GPC who received at least one dose of DBV. Clinical response was assessed during hospitalization, at 3 months and at 1 year. Results: Eighty-three patients with median age of 73 years were enrolled; 73.5% were male; 59.04% had BSI and 49.04% IE (44.04% prosthetic valve IE, 32.4% native IE, 23.5% pacemaker lead). The most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus in BSI (49%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci in IE (44.1%). All patients with IE were clinically cured in hospital; at 12 months, there was 2.9% loss to follow-up, 8.8% mortality unrelated to IE, and 2.9% therapeutic failure rate. The percentage effectiveness of DBV to treat IE was 96.7%. The clinical cure rate for BSI was 100% during hospital stay and at 3 months; there were no recurrences or deaths during the follow-up. No patient discontinued treatment for adverse events. The saving in hospital stay was 636 days for BSI (315,424.20€) and 557 days for IE (283,187.45€). Conclusions: DBV is an effective consolidation antibiotic therapy in clinically stabilized patients with IE and/or BSI. It proved to be a cost-effective treatment, reducing the hospital stay, thanks to the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics profile of this drug.es_ES
dc.format.extent10 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBMCes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceAnn Clin Microbiol Antimicrob (2019) 18:30es_ES
dc.subject.otherEndocarditis,es_ES
dc.subject.otherBloodstream infectiones_ES
dc.subject.otherDalbavancines_ES
dc.titleDALBACEN cohort: dalbavancin as consolidation therapy in patients with endocarditis and/or bloodstream infection produced by gram-positive coccies_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-019-0329-6es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1186/s12941-019-0329-6
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

Attribution 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International