Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorPozueta, Ana
dc.contributor.authorLage, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Martínez, María
dc.contributor.authorKazimierczak, Martha
dc.contributor.authorBravo, María
dc.contributor.authorLópez García, Sara
dc.contributor.authorRiancho Zarrabeitia, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Suárez, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorVázquez Higuera, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorArcocha-Torres, María de
dc.contributor.authorBanzo, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Bonilla, Julio Francisco 
dc.contributor.authorBerciano, José Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Rodríguez, Eloy Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Juan, Pascual 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-15T17:38:23Z
dc.date.available2020-07-15T17:38:23Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1387-2877
dc.identifier.issn1875-8908
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/18923
dc.description.abstractBackground: Semantic dementia (SD) is a subtype of frontotemporal lobe degeneration characterized by semantic loss, with other cognitive functions initially preserved. SD requires differential diagnosis with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Semantic knowledge can be evaluated through different tests; however, most of them depend on language. Objective: We describe the development of a brief drawing task that may be helpful for the differential diagnosis of SD. Methods: Seventy-two patients, including 32 AD, 19 bvFTD, and 21 SD were asked to draw 12 items with different age of acquisition and familiarity, belonging to four different semantic categories. We employed the drawings of healthy volunteers to build a scoring scheme. Results: Turtle, strawberry, train, and envelope were the items of each category that best discriminated between groups and were selected for the Brief drawing task. The discriminatory power of the Brief drawing task between SD versus AD and bvFTD patients, estimated through the area under the curve was 0.84 (95% CI = 0.72-0.96, p = 0.000007). In a logistic model, the Brief drawing task (p = 0.003) and VOSP "number location" subtest (p = 0.016) were significant predictors of the diagnosis of SD versus AD and bvFTD after adjustment by the main covariates. The Brief drawing task provided clinically useful qualitative information. SD drawings were characterized by loss of the distinctive features, intrusions, tendency to prototype, and answers like "I don't know what this is". Conclusion: The Brief drawing task appears to reveal deficits in semantic knowledge among patients with SD that may assist in the differential diagnosis with other neurodegenerative diseases.es_ES
dc.format.extent10 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherIOS Presses_ES
dc.rights© IOS Press. The final publication is available at IOS Press through http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190660"es_ES
dc.sourceJ Alzheimers Dis . 2019;72(1):151-160es_ES
dc.subject.otherDementiaes_ES
dc.subject.otherDifferential Diagnosises_ES
dc.subject.otherDrawingses_ES
dc.subject.otherSemantic Dementiaes_ES
dc.subject.otherSemantic Knowledgees_ES
dc.titleA Brief Drawing Task for the Differential Diagnosis of Semantic Dementiaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://www.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190660es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.3233/JAD-190660
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo