Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorAbejón Elías, Ricardo 
dc.contributor.authorRabadán Martínez, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorGarea Vázquez, Aurora 
dc.contributor.authorIrabien Gulías, Ángel 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-26T08:50:10Z
dc.date.available2020-02-26T08:50:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-14
dc.identifier.issn2077-0375
dc.identifier.otherCTQ2014-56820-JINes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/18286
dc.description.abstractLignin is one of the three main components of lignocellulosic biomass and must be considered a raw material with attractive applications from an economic and ecological point of view. Therefore, biorefineries must have in mind the most adequate processing to obtain high-quality lignin and the separation tasks that play a key role to improve the purity of the lignin. Separation techniques based on membranes are a promising way to achieve these requirements. In this work, the separation performance of the SILM (Supported Ionic Liquid Membrane) formed with [BMIM][DBP] as IL (Ionic Liquid) and PTFE as membrane support was compared to a nanofiltration (NF) membrane (NP010 by Microdyn-Nadir) and two ultrafiltration (UF) membranes (UF5 and UF10 by Trisep). The SILM showed selective transport of Kraft lignin, lignosulphonate, xylose, and glucose in aqueous solutions. Although it was stable under different conditions and its performance was improved by the integration of agitation, it was not competitive when compared to NF and UF membranes, although the latter ones suffered fouling. The NF membrane was the best alternative for the separation of lignosulphonates from monosaccharides (separation factors around 75 while SILM attained only values lower than 3), while the UF5 membrane should be selected to separate Kraft lignin and monosaccharides (separation factors around 100 while SILM attained only values below 3).es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), Project number CTQ2014‐56820‐JIN and co‐funded by FEDER.es_ES
dc.format.extent16 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceMembranes, 2020, 10(2), 29es_ES
dc.subject.otherSupported ionic liquid membraneses_ES
dc.subject.otherSeparationes_ES
dc.subject.otherImidazolium‐based ionic liquides_ES
dc.subject.otherUltrafiltration and nanofiltration membraneses_ES
dc.subject.otherSeparation factorses_ES
dc.subject.otherKraft lignines_ES
dc.subject.otherLignosulphonatees_ES
dc.subject.otherMonosaccharideses_ES
dc.titleComparison of supported ionic liquid membranes and polymeric ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for separation of lignin and monosaccharideses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.3390/membranes10020029
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.