Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorGómez Ruiz, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorDiban Gómez, Nazely 
dc.contributor.authorUrtiaga Mendia, Ana María 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-15T08:15:36Z
dc.date.available2021-01-31T03:45:17Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-08
dc.identifier.issn1383-5866
dc.identifier.issn1873-3794
dc.identifier.otherCTM2013-44081-Res_ES
dc.identifier.otherCTM2016-75509-Res_ES
dc.identifier.otherCTQ2015-71650-RDTes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/14821
dc.description.abstractThis work aims to study the effect of the distinctive chemical and structural surface features of boron doped diamond (BDD) anodes on their electrochemical performance for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) degradation. Commercial BDD anodes were compared: (i) a microcrystalline (MCD) coating on silicon; and (ii) an ultrananocrystalline (UNCD) coating on niobium. MCD gave rise to the complete PFOA (0.24 mmol L−1) degradation in 4 h, at any applied current density in the range 1–5 mA cm−2. On the contrary, only 21% PFOA removal was achieved when using UNCD at 5 mA cm−2 under comparable experimental conditions. Similarly, the total organic carbon (TOC) was reduced by 89% using MCD, whereas only 13% TOC decrease was obtained by UNCD. In order to explain the dissimilar electrochemical activities, the morphological and chemical characterization of the electrode materials was developed by means of FESEM microscopy, XPS and Raman spectroscopy. The UNCD anode surface showed characteristic ultrananocrystalline grain size (2–25 nm), higher boron doping and greater content of H-terminated carbon, whereas the MCD anode was less conductive but contained higher sp3 carbon on the anode surface. Overall, the MCD electrode features allowed more efficient PFOA electrolysis than the UNCD anode. As a result of their distinctive performance, the energy needed for the maximum PFOA degradation (after 4 h) using MCD anode was only 1.4 kWh m−3, while the estimated energy consumption for the UNCD anode would be 37-fold higher. It is concluded that the use of the MCD anode involves considerable energy costs savings.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial support from the projects CTM2013-44081-R, CTM2016-75509-R and to the Spanish Excellence Network E3TECH (CTQ2015-71650-RDT) (MINECO, SPAIN-FEDER 2014–2020) is gratefully acknowledged. B. Gomez also thanks the FPI research scholarship (BES-2014-071045). Dr. J. Carrillo-Abad is gratefully acknowledged for performing the cyclic voltammograms included in supplementary data.es_ES
dc.format.extent43 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceSeparation and Purification Technology, 2019, 208, 169-177es_ES
dc.subject.otherBoron doped diamond (BDD)es_ES
dc.subject.otherMicroscrystallinees_ES
dc.subject.otherUltrananocrystallinees_ES
dc.subject.otherElectrolysises_ES
dc.subject.otherPerfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)es_ES
dc.titleComparison of microcrystalline and ultrananocrystalline boron doped diamond anodes: Influence on perfluorooctanoic acid electrolysises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.03.044es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1016/j.seppur.2018.03.044
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo

© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license