Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorOlmos Martínez, José Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorHernández Hernández, José Luis 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Chamorro, María Josefina
dc.contributor.authorPariente Rodrigo, Emilio Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorCastillo Obeso, Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Alhambra, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Macías, Jesús 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-11T14:37:37Z
dc.date.available2019-01-01T03:45:10Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.identifier.issn0914-8779
dc.identifier.issn1435-5604
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/13687
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of densitometric osteoporosis and vertebral fractures in Spanish men aged ?50 years, and to study how the relationship between them may change depending on how osteoporosis is diagnosed. A community-based population of 1003 men aged ?50 years was studied. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DXA at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip. Vertebral fractures were assessed by lateral thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs. The prevalence of osteoporosis was estimated with both the World Health Organization (WHO) (T-score of <-2.5 at the femoral neck, calculated using the young white female normal reference database) and the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) criteria (T-score of <-2.5 at the femoral neck, total hip or lumbar spine, calculated using the young white male normal reference database). The prevalence of osteoporosis using the WHO criterion was 1.1% and using the NOF criterion was 13%, while that of vertebral fractures was 21.3%. The area under the curve (AUC) for the relationship between BMD and vertebral fracture prevalence was 0.64. The odds ratio for osteoporosis using the WHO definition was 2.57 (p = 0.13), and 1.78 (p = 0.007) using the NOF definition. Vertebral fracture prevalence rose with age. The prevalence of osteoporosis increased only moderately in men aged >70 years with the WHO criterion, and showed no change using the NOF definition. The prevalence of osteoporosis in Spanish men using the WHO definition is too small to have any meaningful clinical use. Although the figure is higher using the NOF definition, it would seem that population-based studies of BMD in men are of questionable value.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunded by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI15/00521), and the National Network for Aging Studies (RETICEF, Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Envejecimiento y Fragilidad) (RD12/0043/0009), that included FEDER funds from the EU, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain.es_ES
dc.format.extent8 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rights© Springer. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00774-017-0812-0es_ES
dc.sourceJ Bone Miner Metab. 2018 Jan;36(1):103-110es_ES
dc.subject.otherVertebral Fracturees_ES
dc.subject.otherOsteoporosises_ES
dc.subject.otherBone Mineral Densityes_ES
dc.subject.otherMenes_ES
dc.titlePrevalence of vertebral fracture and densitometric osteoporosis in Spanish adult men: The Camargo Cohort Studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-017-0812-0es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1007/s00774-017-0812-0
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo