Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.advisorAcerbi, Silvia 
dc.contributor.authorBarquín Velar, Javier
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-06T12:34:38Z
dc.date.available2017-11-06T12:34:38Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/12208
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT If we read the original sources written by the Christian apologists (Lactantius, Eusebius of Caesarea and others) we realize that the historical figure of Constantine was for the Church of the first times a breath of fresh air. Tortured by many centuries of persecution by the Roman Empire, the Church experimented a drastic change of his situation. In the year 312 Constantine obtained the victory over his enemy Maxentius in the Battle of Milvian Bridge. On the day before of the battle, as the Christian chronicles tell us, God spoke to the Emperor in his dreams and He promised the victory with the Chrismon symbol. Constantine won the battle thanks to the intervention of the God of that religious community that underwent the persecution by his predecessors. So he decides to free it of this oppression with the rewrite of Galerius’s document well-known like 'Edict of Milan' and later, he will convert his faiths. At that moment the Church will receive all the properties that the State had taken away in the persecutions and it will begin to configure his doctrine in a theological context dominated by the continuous conflicts of the heresies. In the Ecumenical Council of Nicea (325), the Church confronted of the most paradigmatic heresy, the Arianism that took away the divinity of Jesus, the Son. Constantine wanted the religious peace and he was a strong defender of the conciliar orthodoxy. The Trinitarian controversy was a danger in the social and theological order and caused continuous confrontations. During his reign Constantine intervened in the sessions of the Council of Nicaea and he achieved to impose the formula of the homoousios to define the equality of essence between the Father and the Son; the consubstantiality of the two hypostatic figures. With this, he resolved the Arian question. With his doctrine Arrio took away also the divinity of the Holy Spirit. With the Ecumenical Council of Constantinople I (381) this hipostatic figure has got the same dignity than the Son and the Father.es_ES
dc.format.extent56 p.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.rights©Javier Barquín Velares_ES
dc.subject.otherConcilioses_ES
dc.subject.otherArrianismoes_ES
dc.subject.otherConstantinoes_ES
dc.subject.otherHomoousioses_ES
dc.subject.otherCounciles_ES
dc.subject.otherArrianismes_ES
dc.subject.otherConstantinees_ES
dc.subject.otherHomoousioses_ES
dc.titleLa génesis de la praxis conciliar ecuménica y el conflicto trinitario: herejía y política en el siglo IV.es_ES
dc.title.alternativeThe genesis of the ecumenical conciliar praxis and the trinitarian conflict: heresy and politics in the IV Centuryes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesises_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_ES
dc.description.degreeGrado en Historiaes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo