Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorAja Sánchez, José Ramón 
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-18T10:02:59Z
dc.date.available2021-01-01T03:45:16Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0066-1619
dc.identifier.issn1783-1334
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/11935
dc.description.abstractAbstract : Aristides was one among the ancient writers who mistakenly rejected the theory that related the seasonal rains on the Ethiopian mountains to the origin of the Nilotic flood, a link that we know today to be closer to the truth than any other ancient theory. The Nile’s two singularities drove Aristides to commit two severe methodological mistakes, which are particularly noticeable in an intellectual of his category: the hydric behavior of the current (apparently opposed to that of other rivers) and the spatial and temporal discrepancy between the atmospheric factors that caused the rising of the river and the perception of said rising in Egypt. Aristides’ forceful rejection of this theory is one of the most interesting factors in the text and one that I shall use in order to define which elements in the Aigyptios are in fact correct and which are not.es_ES
dc.format.extent22 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAncient society. Afdeling Oude geschiedenis. Katholieke Universiteites_ES
dc.rights© Peeters Online Journalses_ES
dc.sourceAncient society, 46, 73-94es_ES
dc.titleAristides did not read Strabo: Ethiopian rains in the "Aigyptios"es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.2143/AS.46.0.3167452es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.2143/AS.46.0.3167452
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo