Mostrar el registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorAbejón Elías, Ricardo 
dc.contributor.authorAbejón Elias, Azucena
dc.contributor.authorGarea Vázquez, Aurora 
dc.contributor.authorTsuru, Toshinori
dc.contributor.authorIrabien Gulías, Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorBelleville, Marie Pierre
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Marcano, José
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Cantabriaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T12:48:27Z
dc.date.available2017-07-31T02:45:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-13
dc.identifier.issn0888-5885
dc.identifier.issn1520-5045
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10902/11190
dc.description.abstractThe present work proposes the design of cascades that integrate ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes to separate the different protein fractions from the protein hydrolysate obtained after hydrolysis of tuna byproducts. Experimental data (permeate flux and rejection of protein fractions under different applied pressures) previously obtained and published by this research group were fitted to empirical models, which were the basis for a process simulation model. High recovery rates (0.9) in the UF stages implied high process yields by reduced desired fraction losses, while similar recovery rates in the NF stages were required for high product purity. However, the applied pressures were not so influential over the performance of the system. Optimization problems were solved to identify the optimal design and operation conditions to maximize the product purity or the process yield. Maximal purity of the preferred 1-4 kDa fraction (49.3% from 19.0% in feed stream) obtained by the configuration with 3 UF stages and another 3 NF stages implied 2 and 5 bar pressures applied in the UF and NF stages, respectively, while 0.9 was the optimal recovery rate value for all the stages. These maximal purity conditions resulted in 62.6% process yield, defined as the percentage of the 1-4 kDa fraction in the feed stream recovered in the product stream. In addition, multiobjective optimization of the process was also carried out to obtain the Pareto graphs that represent the counterbalance between maximal yields and purities.es_ES
dc.format.extent44 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societyes_ES
dc.rights© ACS. This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see http://pubsdc3.acs.org/articlesonrequest/AOR-AyaNPzyWkmWzsCeCxPHUes_ES
dc.sourceIndustrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55 (27), 7493-7504es_ES
dc.subject.otherFish protein hydrolysatees_ES
dc.subject.otherUltrafiltrationes_ES
dc.subject.otherNanofiltrationes_ES
dc.subject.otherFractionation processes_ES
dc.subject.otherMembrane cascadeses_ES
dc.subject.otherOptimizationes_ES
dc.titleIn silico evaluation of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membrane cascades for continuous fractionation of protein hydrolysate from tuna processing byproductes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01495es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.DOI10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01495
dc.type.versionacceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo