| dc.contributor.author | Laso Pérez, Alberto | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mañana Canteli, Mario | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arroyo Gutiérrez, Alberto | |
| dc.contributor.author | González Diego, Antonio | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lecuna Tolosa, Ramón | |
| dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Cantabria | es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-17T07:34:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-17T07:34:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-05 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2172-038X | |
| dc.identifier.other | IPT-2011-1447-920000 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.other | ENE2013-42720-R | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10902/10982 | |
| dc.description.abstract | CIGRE TB601 guide for thermal rating calculations recommends the use of ultrasonic anemometers over mechanical devices [1]. This paper aims to compare the mechanical and ultrasonic wind speed measurement technologies for the purpose of dynamic ampacity rating. The comparison consists of applying the measurements of both anemometers (placed in the same spot) to the computation of ampacity in the same overhead line, and evaluating the diferences at different speed ranges. | es_ES |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Spanish Government under the R+D initiative INNPACTO with reference IPT-
2011-1447-920000 and Spanish R+D initiative with reference ENE2013-42720-R.
The authors of this article would also like to acknowledge Viesgo for its continuous support to the dynamic ampacity rating line of investigation. | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 4 p. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | The European Association for the Development of Renewable Energies, Environment and Power Quality (EA4EPQ) | es_ES |
| dc.rights | © The European Association for the Development of Renewable Energies, Environment and Power Quality (EA4EPQ) | es_ES |
| dc.source | Renewable Energy & Power Quality Journal (RE&PQJ), 2016, 1(14), 770-773 | es_ES |
| dc.source | International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ'16), Madrid | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | Ampacity rating | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | Anemometer | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | Comparison | es_ES |
| dc.title | A comparison of mechanical and ultrasonic anemometers for ampacity thermal rating in overhead lines | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.DOI | 10.24084/repqj/14.450 | |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | es_ES |
