A comparison of mechanical and ultrasonic anemometers for ampacity thermal rating in overhead lines

Ver/Abrir
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10902/10982
ISSN: 2172-038X
Compartir
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas
Google Scholar
Registro completo
Mostrar el registro completo DC
Autoría
Laso Pérez, AlbertoAutoridad Unican; Mañana Canteli, MarioAutoridad Unican; Arroyo Gutiérrez, AlbertoAutoridad Unican; González Diego, AntonioAutoridad Unican; Lecuna Tolosa, RamónAutoridad Unican
Fecha
2016-05
Derechos
© The European Association for the Development of Renewable Energies, Environment and Power Quality (EA4EPQ)
Publicado en
Renewable Energy & Power Quality Journal (RE&PQJ), 2016, 1(14), 770-773
International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ'16), Madrid
Editorial
The European Association for the Development of Renewable Energies, Environment and Power Quality (EA4EPQ)
Palabras clave
Ampacity rating
Anemometer
Comparison
Resumen/Abstract
CIGRE TB601 guide for thermal rating calculations recommends the use of ultrasonic anemometers over mechanical devices [1]. This paper aims to compare the mechanical and ultrasonic wind speed measurement technologies for the purpose of dynamic ampacity rating. The comparison consists of applying the measurements of both anemometers (placed in the same spot) to the computation of ampacity in the same overhead line, and evaluating the diferences at different speed ranges.
Colecciones a las que pertenece